Back to Research.
- we use EE to build thanks to existing research databases
- an associative array of problem with their tree of solutions over time
- we use this resulting array (2) to make pattern matching of problems with state of the art solutions
- we refine those propositions based on feedback from microservices (that are now completed based on the generative array (2))
- using similarity between user fields or other heuristics build over time and also through EE, (recursive solution) we can apply this very same technique through our own associative array
Finding links between domains thanks to scientometrics (and thus the most likely advance that will help the starting domain) could also be done recursively.
One has not to be limited to the first level but can go on and on (probably with decreasing reliability though).
(originally from First usages I would like to try)
- phylogenetic view limited to
- creativity
- algorithms
- optimization
- AGI
- machine learning
- history/evolution of Software development process
- military doctrine
- obviously... cosmology
- average ontogenic view vs phologenic view, is there a fractal pattern?
- do we mimic the evolution of simpler organisms, even non multi-cellular organisms, to reach step by step a more complex model the same way our entire specie (and even others before) did?
- is it the same that Thomas Wynn's "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" ("Wynn supports his argument by using a controversial theory known as <<ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny>>. This theory claims that the phases of cognitive development in children mirrors the phases of cognitive evolution in the species." page 3 of The Prehistory of the Mind reviewed by Andy Gorman) or Étienne Serres' recapitulation theory?
- cosmology
- ?
