Content
Sophisms
Exercises
- trying to help someone to use sophisms on purpose in order to trick him or her
- detect sophisms during IRC conversations
- know your own "sophisms arsenal"
Sophisms (non-official ones)
- fairness before realism
- analyzing a situation based on what it should morally and ethically be then on the coherence of that model
- vs. first being realistic then and only then checking if it is morally and ethically acceptable or not
- what is the point of being right about something that is wrong?
- analyzing a situation based on what it should morally and ethically be then on the coherence of that model
- reverted causality
- especially common with long-term processes demanding efforts
- "Why do you do sport X, you are already fit!" while the person stays fit precisely because he or she is regularly practicing physical activities.
- "Why do you eat so healthy, you are so thin!" while the person masters his or her weight precisely because he or she eats properly.
- "Why do you read so much, you are already so smart!" while the person is knowledgeable precisely because he or she is investing a lot of time studying.
- especially common with long-term processes demanding efforts
- ad Galileo (original "creation" ;)
- When someone is being ridiculed for a lack of solid argumentation (including peer review or references) they describe themselves as the new Galileo, original and thus persecuted.
- see rule 35 of John Baez's Crackpot index, 1998
- started the http://www.agi-wiki.org/Main/AGICrackpots equivalent as an homage
- the unknown unknown against "intellectual bully"
- understanding understanding is still an active topic of research
- hermeneutics
- epistemology
- Popper's demarcation problem
- meta-skeptic
- understanding understanding is still an active topic of research
- recurrent blackhole of meta-conversation
- discussing the method of conversation rather than the initial problematic
- common after pointing out sophisms used
Official sophism
Views
Arguments to defend (cognitive) territory
More often than not arguing is about territory, even if it is about cognitive territory (i.e. a theory or an idea). Consequently what is being debated is not necesseraly the point but the ability to demonstrate to other that on can defend his own territory.
Inspiration : Garlic argument during Big Brother (UK) 10x28
Going further
- Do text analysis tools (based on lexicometry, logometry, ML, ...) provide detection feature?
- lab Logométrie et corpus politiques, médiatiques et littéraires by the UMR 6039 : Bases, Corpus, Langage, Nice
- How to win every argument: the use and Abuse of Logic by Madsen Pirie, Continuum 2006
- Compendium software tool for mapping information, ideas and arguments by The Open University
References
- Le Petit cours d’autodéfense intellectuelle by Normand Baillargeon, Lux 2005
- Rhetoric according to Wikipedia
- my notes on Petit traité de manipulation à l'usage des honnêtes gens, PUG 2002
- Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy
- There you go again: Orwell Comes to America, LIVE from the NYPL, 2007
- especially Part I : Propaganda, Then and Now: What Orwell did and didn't know
- Propaganda by Edward Bernays, 1928
- Argument Clinic from Monty Python's Flying Circus
- A Theory of Epistemic Justification by Jarrett Leplin, Springer 2009
- Critical Thinking videos by Jacques Ranciere, Continental Philosophy, 2008
- Colloque Figures de l’imposture, entre philosophie, littérature et sciences at l’École normale supérieure (ENS), June 2009
- Project Implicit to "experience the manner in which human minds display the effects of stereotypic and prejudicial associations acquired from their socio-cultural environment."
- my notes on The Politics of Misinformation - Eldelman
- Wikipedia:Informal fallacy
- Fallacy Files first published on 2001
- Karaté mental / Le culbuto, l’effet bof et autres ni-ni, Outils d’autodéfense intellectuelle, chapitre 1, La Traverse #1 July 2010
CONTENT
CONTACT
UPDATES
LAST TWEET
CONTENT RIGHTS
RSS for this page only
